Search blog.co.uk

Posts archive for: 17 January, 2009
  • Censor in America

    *

    Today is the 18th anniversary of the outbreak of
    the GUlf War.

    On the anniversary of this rather forgotten war
    after the war of Iraq, I send you a part of a
    thought-provoking article about the role of censor
    in war, which is a memoir by a Japanese critic and
    a historian.

    It is a part of a memoir by late Mr.ETOH Jun, who was
    a critic of modern Japanese literature and politics.

    He was known for his unique research about the censorship
    by the US Occupation in occupied Japan----He researched
    extensively about the influence of American censorship in
    occupied Japan on poetwar Japanese culture and politics.

    With such unique viewpoint about the history of censorship
    in Japan and the US, he reviewd the Gulf War from his proper
    viewpoint on the role of censorship in war, right after the
    Gulf War in 1991.

    Following is a part of an article by a Japanese critic
    who by chance heard an ex-official of the US government,
    Dean Rusk, state his view on the role of censorship in
    American wars.

    You are urged to read this and think about the role of
    censorship in American history.----America was not an
    exceptinal state in its history of censorship.

    -------------------------------------------------------------
    (Memoir by late ETOH Jun)

    Some may have recalled that there is censor in our world
    during the Gulf War this year. Not a few young generation,
    on the other hand, might have learnt that there is censor in
    our world for the first time. Both the multinational(US) Army
    and the Iraqis implemented very utter censor. As the result,
    to our mystery, we are unaware exactly how many Iraqis this
    war claimed. According to a certain faierly reliable source,
    the war may have claimed 300 thousands Iraqi soldiers in Kuwait only.
    On the other hand, the American casualities, which is supposed to be
    hundreds officially, is uncertain, to tell the truth. Censor created such
    image of clean war in which we cannot see the images of the dead.
    The released images by the multinational Army, which we saw on
    television, were made under the American control.
    Seeing those images made by US, I was convinced that the US is doing
    the war very seriously.

    My memory is back to 11 years ago. In the spring of 1980, I was in America.
    I was in America as a research fellow in the Wilson Center in Washington D.C.
    I was sent there by the Japan Foundation to do research about the censor
    US Occupation Army had done in Japan during the years US occupied Japan.
    By chance, while I was staying there, a symposium on Vietnam War was held.
    Neil Sheehan, an American journalist who had campaigned against the war
    during the Vietnam War, was one of the research fellows who had been in the
    Wilson Center at the time.
    In contrast with the Gulf War this year, Vietnam War was a poignant war to
    the United States. In addition, since the spring of 1980 was right after rescue
    operation of the American hostages in Iran failed, the symposium was held in
    the Wilson Center in a very depressing mood.

    I must remind you of Dean Rusk here. Dean Rusk, the ex-secretary of the state
    during the Vietnam War, had retired many years ago then.
    He became a professor at Georgia University in Georgia State, which was his home.
    He was invited to the symposium by the Wilson Center and came from Atlanta to
    Washington D.C. by airplain to attend the symposium. He was not one of the
    panelists nor speaker. I noticed an old man sitting silently in a corner of the floor.
    When I noticed the man as being alike Dean Rusk, it was very Dean Rusk.
    He was listening the panelers' debate silently.
    As I am a foreigner, I was listening what Americans speak enthusiastically about
    the Vietnam War silently as well, to learn about the issue.
    Then, Mr.Rusk, the ex-secretary of the State, raised his arm at the end of the
    symposium. He stated all who were there a very poignant comment.
    “I could hear many valuable opinions here. I, however, think that we failed the war.
    I guess you all agree to this point”.
    The audience were silent. Mr.Rusk continued.
    “Why did we fail the war? The reason was because we did not do censor even once
    in the Vietnam War. In the past World War Ⅱ, we implemented a very hard censor
    and won the war. But we did not do censor in the Vietnam War. As the result,
    we could not get supports from the people in our own country. Imagine how the people,
    who watch the images of their sons, boyfriends, or husbands, being murdered cruelly
    by Vietcongs every day, would respond to our govenment's campaign to continue this war.
    There's no reason people would accept it positively.
    No government is capable to continue to fight and win the war under such midia
    circumstances.”
    When Mr.Rusk said as above, the audience were in complete silence. I was most
    impressed by the sight Neil Sheehan, who was criticizing the war, did not rufute at all.
    He was, on contrary, nodding with a solemn face to Mr.Rusk's words.

    (from “A Personal Proposal of abolishing the Constitution 1946” by ETOH Jun:
    SAPIO May.9, 1991, p.21
    (translated by NISHIOKA Masanori--Note:The remark by Mr.Dean Rusk in this
    translation above is my reverse translation from the original Japanese text.
    As it is a reverse translation from what late Mr.Etoh recalled and wrote in Japanese,
    Mr.Rusk's remark in my reverse translation above must differ from his original remark
    there, which he spoke in English.)

    ------------------------------------------------------------------

    It is dangerous many Americans are unaware that their
    country has such history of censorship which was
    invisible to the American public.

    Jan. 17, 2009(Sat)

    On the 18th anniversary of the
    outbreak of the Gulf War

    Nori

    -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    References

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_War
    (about the Gulf War)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_Sheehan
    (About Neil Sheehan)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dean_Rusk
    (About Dean Rusk)

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occupation_of_Japan
    (About the occupation of Japan including censorship by the
    US occuapation)

    http://www.froginawell.net/japan/2006/03/the-case-of-taiwa-shinron/
    (About censorship in occupied Japan: Frog in a well)

    http://www.faqs.org/abstracts/Health/Censorship-of-medical-journals-in-occupied-Japan-Censorship-of-the-atomic-bomb-casualty-reports-in-o.html
    (About Censorship of medical journals in Japan)

  • The Sea Bird in the Gulf War

    *

    Today is the 18th anniversary of the outbreak of the Gulf War.

    After the war of Iraq(2003), this war in 1991(the Gulf War)
    seems to be rather forgotten. I recall the war, however, as a
    more horrifying event I witnessed in my lofe, though I "witnessed"
    the war through media--not as my real experience.

    Among the many things I "witnessed" through media during the war,
    I am most impressed by the image of the sea bird that was contaminated
    by oil, whose image was at first explained as a victim of "Iraqi
    environmental terrorism". It was told, at first, that the bird was
    found at a certain sea shore of Saudi Arabia and that the bird was
    standing in spilled oil after the Iraqi released oil to the Persian
    Gulf.

    It was found out, however, that the explanation was illogical
    because the sea stream of Persian Gulf was not so fast as to
    bring the spilled oil to Saudi Arabian sea shore if the oil had
    been really released by the Iraqi in Kuwait. On contrary, it was
    revealed later that the bird had been a victim of American air raid
    that made oil flow into the sea.

    I was appalled when I heard in a radio news that the report of the
    sea bird outraged the public and there appeared even such opinion
    as to say nuclear weapon may be used against Iraqi who commit such
    environmental terrorism in the Western nations. It was appaling to
    witness the public oipnion of "democratic" countires can be thus
    easily misled to an emotional one to condone nuclear attack against
    whatever nation, with a false caption given to a image of really
    miserable bird.

    Our democracy is always at the threat of propaganda with visual
    propagandas. The Gulf War(1991) is a reminder "public opinion" in
    democratic society can be misled with such fraud as the sea bird
    standing in oil given a false comment--the Iraqis did it--to the
    extent of supporting nuclear attack.

    On the 18th anniversary of
    the outbreak of the Gulf War

    Nori

    *

Footer:

The content of this website belongs to a private person, blog.co.uk is not responsible for the content of this website.